November 2, 2014

Zuppardi v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - Slip-and-Fall Lawsuit

Slip-and-fall cases are harder to prove than you think. This is especially true in North Carolina, where not only must plaintiffs prove defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of a given hazard, they must also defend against claims of contributory negligence. tile2.jpg

Contributory negligence is the degree to which a plaintiff shares the blame for the injury in question. In most states, the damages awarded are reduced by whatever percentage of fault a plaintiff is found to share. In North Carolina, however, a finding of just 1 percent contributory negligence means you are barred from collecting anything at all.

So for example, you might slip and fall on a gob of ketchup in the grocery store. The store knew about it and failed to clean it up in a timely manner. However, the store could argue you had a duty to notice the open and obvious hazard of bright red ketchup on the floor and take precautions to avoid it. And they could win on that theory.

Continue reading "Zuppardi v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - Slip-and-Fall Lawsuit" »

October 30, 2014

77-Year-Old Woman Killed in Tragic Swamp Boating Accident

Tourists and visitors to the Southeast region may be put at additional risk if they are unaware of their surroundings or attempting new recreational activities. According to reports, a 77-year-old North Carolina woman drowned in the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia after she fell out of a boat in the Suwanee Canal. The woman was visiting the swamp with her husband at the time of the accident. Authorities reported that the Efland woman was staying with her husband at the Laura S. Walker State Park while visiting the swamp.


Drowning and boating accidents are common along the coast and on inland streams, rivers, and lakes throughout the Southeast. According to reports, the victims' husband stopped to look at something and had turned off the engine. When he restarted the motor, the boat lurched forward, "standing on end" and they both fell backwards out of the boat. Police reports indicate that the husband tried to help his wife, but she become entangled in the boat's propeller and suffered fatal injuries. The accident occurred approximately 7 or 8 miles down from the boat basin where they launched. After initial calls for help were made, local law enforcement officials, fire and rescue personnel, as well as officers from U.S. Fishing and Wildlife Service and the State DNR responded to the scene. Though attempts were made to revive the woman, she was pronounced dead at the refuge by the Ware County coroner.

Continue reading "77-Year-Old Woman Killed in Tragic Swamp Boating Accident" »

October 29, 2014

Family Awarded $97 Million for Death of South Carolina Mayor

The family of a South Carolina mayor who was shot by a police officer has been awarded $97 million in a wrongful death case. According to reports, the mayor was shot and killed after he complained about the officer's aggressive behavior. The wrongful death verdict was considered a success for the family who tragically lost their loved one in a preventable crime. The mayor was shot in the chest with a revolver belonging to an officer in May 2011. The mayor was shot on a small dirt road and, according to local authorities, the officer still has not been charged with the crime.


The tension between the mayor and the officer grew after the mayor objected the arrest of an employee in his construction business. The family sued the officer and the town of Cottageville, alleging that it should never have hired the officer due to his checkered past and troubled employment history. An attorney representing the officer alleges that the mayor had bipolar disorder and was enraged when he confronted the officer. A defense attorney claimed that the officer only shot the mayor in self-defense.

Continue reading "Family Awarded $97 Million for Death of South Carolina Mayor" »

October 28, 2014

One Year Later: North Carolina State Fair Accident Victims Still Recovering

Victims who suffer injuries are often in recovery long after the headlines fade. The victims of an October 2013 North Carolina State Fair accident are still in recovery after being severely injured on the "Vortex" ride. While it's been a year since the accident, the family remains in recovery after suffering permanent and debilitating injuries. According to local reports, the family injured while at the state fair included a woman, her husband, their son, and their niece. Despite being released from the hospital since the accident, all of the victims are still under doctor's care.


Last October, the family arrived at the state fair to enjoy the festivities, but the night quickly turned tragic. According to eyewitnesses, the riders fell approximately 30 feet. They were initially unconscious but then regained consciousness before being taken away by paramedics. According to investigators, a key safety mechanism was tampering with, leaving victims at risk of serious injury or wrongful death.

Continue reading "One Year Later: North Carolina State Fair Accident Victims Still Recovering" »

October 24, 2014

Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC - Apartment Fall Premises Liability Lawsuit

Building codes are established to keep structures safe. When those codes are violated or ignored, innocent people - including tenants, guests and bystanders - may become injured. In these situations, injured parties may be entitled to relief through a premises liability lawsuit.
However, sometimes claims are not as straightforward as they appear on the surface, particularly when older buildings are involved. That's because while older buildings may not conform to current standards of construction, sometimes those structures are "grandfathered in," so long as they adhered to the previous codes at the time they were built or renovated.

Still, that might not be a catch-all defense, depending on the facts of the case.

Continue reading "Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC - Apartment Fall Premises Liability Lawsuit" »

October 22, 2014

Christensen v. Alaska Sales - Early Head Injury Treatment Critical

Several years ago, a woman in rural Alaska struck two moose on a dark highway. She found herself disoriented, but she hadn't broken any bones. She had the capacity to call police and her husband. They noted a large mark in the middle of her forehead, but she shrugged it off, declining emergency treatment.
But in the days that followed, she began to experience dizzy spells and headaches. Her balance increasingly worsened, and she kept falling. Her short-term memory began to suffer. Her speech became disjointed. Her symptoms continued to worsen. After a week, she sought help from a doctor. She was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury. The injury gave rise to a claim of seat belt defect in Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc..

Latent head injuries are common, as the effects are not always immediately apparent. Early intervention can be key in reducing the damage. This is why it's critical for anyone who has suffered a head injury - whether in a car accident or sports injury or fall.

Continue reading "Christensen v. Alaska Sales - Early Head Injury Treatment Critical" »

October 19, 2014

Young v. U.S. - Federal Park Hazard Injury Lawsuit Proceeds

Suing a local government entity is accompanied by a unique set of legal hurdles. Suing the federal government for injury can have mountainous hurdles.
Bu that doesn't mean a case isn't ever worth pursuing, as Young v. United States recently revealed. Here, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted plaintiffs the right to continue their case under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), after a woman suffered serious injuries after she fell into a deep hole formed underneath the snow near a buried transformer in a national park, close to the main visitor center. She alleged the National Park Service knew of the danger because it had created it and failed to warn visitors.

Although the lower court dismissed the claim as barred under the discretionary function exception under FTCA, the appellate court flatly rejected this defense. Justices called the decision not to warn "totally divorced" from any other policy consideration except the one the park service should have upheld: the safety of some 2 million visitors who patronize the park every year.

Continue reading "Young v. U.S. - Federal Park Hazard Injury Lawsuit Proceeds" »

October 16, 2014

Temple v. Mary Washington Hospital: On Discovery Motions in Medical Malpractice Cases

Temple v. Mary Washington Hospital, a case from the Supreme Court of Virginia, involved a medical malpractice case filed in the name of decedent. According to court records, decedent went to defendant's emergency room complaining of chest pain and shortness of breath. Four hours after getting to the hospital, he was deceased.

ekg-293359-m.jpgAfter filing the personal injury case, plaintiff, through counsel, requested certain discovery from defendant. Included in these requests were copies of defendant's policies and procedure related to how a patient in decedent's condition should be treated by hospital staff. Defendant responded to plaintiff's requests for production of documents, claiming these documents were not relevant to the lawsuit and were privileged documents.

Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery, requesting that the trial judge order defendant to produce the requested documents. The trial judge found that these documents were not relevant, as they would not lead to discoverable evidence, agreed that they were privileged, and denied the motion.

Continue reading "Temple v. Mary Washington Hospital: On Discovery Motions in Medical Malpractice Cases" »

October 14, 2014

Nguyen v. Western Digital Corp: On the Statute of Limitations in Personal Injury Cases

Nguyen v. Western Digital Corp., a case from the Court of Appeals of the State of California, Sixth Appellate District, involved plaintiff who was born in 1994. Her mother worked for defendant from the late 1980s through 1998. Her mother worked in clean rooms in which she was exposed to tetratogenic and reproductively harmful chemicals for extended periods of time.

3mspraymount-138829-m.jpgThese chemicals are now known to cause serious harm to unborn children. Plaintiff's mother was pregnant during the time she was exposed to the chemicals. Her employment involved the manufacturing of semiconductors that required the use of a combination of toxic substances and chemicals, and there is to no way to separate which specific chemical she was exposed to at any give time.

Plaintiff (through her guardian) alleged in her complaint that the clean rooms were clean in terms of protecting the company's products but not in terms of protecting workers from toxic chemicals. The protective clothing given to workers was also to protect the semiconductors from contamination from the workers and did nothing to prevent the workers from absorbing the toxic material through their skin or inhaling toxic vapors into their lungs.

Continue reading "Nguyen v. Western Digital Corp: On the Statute of Limitations in Personal Injury Cases" »

October 12, 2014

Santana-Concepcion v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc.: On the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Santana-Concepcion v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc., a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, involved a plaintiff who was a registered nurse. She had a head CT (CAT scan), which revealed a large arachnoid cyst. An arachnoid cyst is fluid-filled membrane sac that forms between the base of the brain and the spinal chord.

mri-head-scan-370098-m.jpgAfter being diagnosed with the cyst, her doctors told her that surgery was not necessary. Later that same year, she experienced extreme pain and went to a local emergency room. She was referred to a neurosurgeon who recommended surgery to remove the cyst and medicine to reduce the intracranial pressure. The surgeon told her that it was a matter of life or death.

Plaintiff told the surgeon to do whatever he needed (including the placement of a shunt) as long as she wouldn't be in any more pain. This occurred while she was on vacation in Puerto Rico.

Continue reading "Santana-Concepcion v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc.: On the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits " »

October 9, 2014

Jones v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC: On Slip and Fall Lawsuits

Jones v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC, is a premises liability case in which plaintiff was walking through a casino parking garage when he was injured. Plaintiff was walking in the space between the wall and the front of the parking space when he tripped on a concrete parking bumper at the front of one of the spaces and fell to the concrete floor. It should be noted that the area in which he was walking was not designated for pedestrian travel, but there was nothing to indicate that pedestrian travel was prohibited in that area.

fence-726216-m.jpgPlaintiff's allegation is the concrete parking bumper was not properly aligned with the front of the parking space to the point where it was is in his path of travel and that the bumper was the actual and proximate cause of his injuries.

Continue reading "Jones v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC: On Slip and Fall Lawsuits " »

October 4, 2014

Hunting Accident in North Carolina Results in Death

According to recent report from ABC News 13, a North Carolina man was killed in a hunting accident when his friend allegedly shot him with a crossbow. The two men were deer hunting on private property when one hunter had mistaken his friend for a deer.

archery-2-358728-m.jpgThe hunters were wearing camouflage and not blaze orange. However, under North Carolina law, during archery bow season, hunters are not required to wear blaze orange, as they are during rifle season. The apparent logic behind this regulation is that a hunter will be much closer to a deer when shooting with a bow, as opposed to a gun, where it is more likely that a fellow hunter could be mistaken for a deer.

As of this time, charges have not been filed against the hunter, and authorities have stated that, at least for now, they are treating this as an accident pending further investigation.

Continue reading "Hunting Accident in North Carolina Results in Death " »

October 2, 2014

North Carolina Man Dies in Rafting Accident

Whitewater rafting has steadily gained popularity since the 1970s. It is an exciting and fun outdoor activity enjoyed by people across the nation. Unfortunately, on some occasions the fun can quickly turn to tragedy.

river-rafting-864944-m.jpgAccording to a recent news article from the Johnson City Press, a North Carolina man has died in a rafting accident on the Ocoee River. The victim was on a rafting trip led by a professional guide when the raft flipped over on a rapid. He and five other occupants on the raft fell out of the raft.

After being pulled from the water farther down the river, he was unresponsive. He was taken to a local hospital but was pronounced dead upon arrival. Authorities have not released a cause of death but noted that there were no apparent external injuries and that the victim was wearing a life jacket and helmet.

Continue reading "North Carolina Man Dies in Rafting Accident" »

September 30, 2014

Davis v. Brickman Landscaping - Fire Death Negligence Standard of Proof High

The death of two children in a horrific hotel fire sparked a civil lawsuit brought by their parents, after they learned a storage closet beneath the stairwell lacked a fire sprinkler, as is required under state fire codes.
Our Spartanburg wrongful death attorneys know in negligence actions where municipal building and fire codes may have been breached, the attorney handling the case must have extensive experience. Statutes regarding these matters can be convoluted, and when it's alleged someone died as a result of a violation, there is a lot at stake.

In Davis v. Brickman Landscaping, Ltd., the primary question before the New Jersey Supreme Court was whether plaintiff's expert witness testimony was adequate in showing the defendant, a private company that employed fire sprinkler inspectors, breached the applicable standard of care in carrying out its duties. Because of the complexity of state and local fire codes, an expert witness was required in the case, and the one produced by plaintiff reportedly failed to adequately attest to the alleged breach of industry standards. Therefore, dismissal of the claim was upheld.

Continue reading "Davis v. Brickman Landscaping - Fire Death Negligence Standard of Proof High" »

September 28, 2014

Gregory v. One Republic Home Protection - Wrongful Death Claim Denied

The verdict favoring a home warranty company, sued for wrongful death by the mother of a Greensboro man who died of carbon monoxide poisoning in his home in 2008, has been upheld by the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

The mother/plaintiff alleged the warranty company was negligent in hiring a heating/cooling company with a poor business quality record. The firm had been on probation by the North Carolina Board of smokealarm.jpgExaminers of Plumbing, Heating and Fire Sprinkler Contractors. Later, the same company was the target of a complaint alleging incompetence that nearly resulted in a customer's new home catching fire.

Our Greensboro wrongful death lawyers understand that while plaintiff sued on a host of negligence theories, including negligent retention and vicarious liability, the two at issue upon appeal were two claims dismissed prior to trial - Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practice and breach of implied warranty. The appellate court ultimately indicated the directed verdict for defendant on the UDTP claim was proper, and the plaintiff failed to properly preserve the grant of directed verdict on the breach of implied warranty claim.

Continue reading "Gregory v. One Republic Home Protection - Wrongful Death Claim Denied" »